Hi Laurens,
> Here's my proof of concept: https://ttm.sh/qhr.png
You might want to turn off the adjusting of space between words which is
giving a straight edge to the end of lines: ‘.na’. This would remove
the varying space before ‘Goblins’ and ‘Orcs’, which looks odd to me.
A non-breaking spa
Am Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 12:25:31PM +0100 schrieb Ralph Corderoy:
> You might want to turn off the adjusting of space [...]
yay, will look into those spacing issues ...
> You could play with setting a trap, sounds right up your street!, WHen
> output reaches a vertical position with ‘.wh’ to remo
Hi Laurens,
> I'll lo ok at setting up some traps :D
The tutorial at the end of Ossanna and Kernighan's CSTR 54 uses ‘.wh’.
https://troff.org/54.pdf
> Is there a way to preserve the extra wide page offset while next to
> the image ? The regular paragraph macros seem to reset PO whenever
> they g
Hi,
DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
> Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
No, i think that would be pure madness given the amount of working
time available in any of the roff projects.
I expect the amount of effort required to be significantly larger
than
Hi Branden,
G. Branden Robinson wrote on Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 11:23:11PM -0500:
> At 2022-08-12T16:30:01+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> There are people using Plan 9 for practical work though, they have
>> even occasionally posted on the groff and mandoc lists, so that is a
>> bit more of a proble
On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM EDT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
>
> > Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
>
> No, i think that would be pure madness given the amount of working
> time available in any of the roff projects.
>
Hi,
On 8/14/22 16:49, DJ Chase wrote:
On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM EDT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi,
DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
No, i think that would be pure madness given the amount of working
time available in
Ulrich --
On Sun, Aug 14, 2022, Ulrich Lauther wrote:
> I found the culprit. It is in my macro NumberPages that you see
> at the top of my example file. Only if I call this macro, the
> problem occurs.
> .MAC NumberPages END
> .PRINTSTYLE TYPESET
> .HEADERS OFF
> .FOOTERS OFF
> .PAGINATE
> .PAG
On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 12:32 PM EDT, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On 8/14/22 16:49, DJ Chase wrote:
> > On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM EDT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> >> You appear to massively overrate the importance end-users
> >> typically attribute to standardization.
> >
> > That’s probably because
At 2022-08-14T16:15:54+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > I also have a PR pending with Illumos.
> > https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/pull/83
>
> Illumos isn't doing development on GitHub.
Yeah, I promptly got a lengthy follow-up from a member of the core team
pointing me to even more lengthy
At 2022-08-14T14:49:10+, DJ Chase wrote:
> On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM EDT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
> >
> > > Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
> >
> > No, i think that would be pure madness given the amount of working
On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 6:35 PM EDT, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2022-08-14T14:49:10+, DJ Chase wrote:
> > On Sun Aug 14, 2022 at 9:56 AM EDT, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > > DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
> > >
> > > > Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
>
Ingo Schwarze writes:
Hi,
DJ Chase wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:27:34PM +:
> Have we ever considered a de jure *roff standard?
No, i think that would be pure madness given the amount of working
time available in any of the roff projects.
I expect the amount of effort required to be s
13 matches
Mail list logo
