Re: man-intro

2021-05-23 Thread Oliver Corff
Well, isn't this a good reason to emphasize the difference between man and help? Not finding "cd" in a man page means that it is a shell internal; this could be stated as an explicite reason why it doesn't come with its own manpage. Perhaps a note of caution to the novice reader could be added i

Re: man-intro

2021-05-23 Thread Oliver Corff
Hi All, in a follow-up to my last message I just want to give one real-world example of a very terse manpage, "for the initiated reader only." Take refer(1). It starts with NAME    refer - preprocess bibliographic references for groff DESCRIPTION    This  file  documents  the  GNU  ve

Re: How to build groff (was: Install hiccups with groff 1.23.0 tarball)

2021-05-23 Thread Oliver Corff
Hi, Branden, thank you very much for your detailed answer! On 23/05/2021 10:27, G. Branden Robinson wrote: I wanted to have a better understanding of the current state of groff, and downloaded groff-1.23.0 from https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git, following the link from https://www.g

Re: getting more out of man pages with less(1)

2021-05-23 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20210523212903.58vrh%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: |Good evening and Hello. And thanks to Mario Blättermann, replying to the mail unrevealed a bug that is present in the MUA i maintain since at least 2003 (nail 10.05)! A nice Monday i wish. (And happy 80th birthday, Bob Dylan

Re: getting more out of man pages with less(1)

2021-05-23 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Good evening and Hello. Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20210523004836.gta8l%stef...@sdaoden.eu>: ... ||> Good idea. I've further changed the Subject: to reflect the flow of the ||> discussion. | ... ||> I also wonder if the pager wars are basically over and less(1) won them. || ||That's certa

Re: man-intro

2021-05-23 Thread Peter Schaffter
On Sun, May 23, 2021, Oliver Corff wrote: > in a follow-up to my last message I just want to give one > real-world example of a very terse manpage, "for the initiated > reader only." > > Take refer(1). > Terseness is nice, but in the case presented here the first paragraph of > DESCRIPTION in the