In order to get the spacing right, you might also tell eqn what kind of
symbols these are:
.EQ
define implies 'type "relation" \[rA]'
define therefore 'type "operator" \[tf]'
.EN
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:50 AM Damian McGuckin wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Mike Skec wrote:
>
> > I was wondering
> > in spite of the warnings. Are the warnings a bug?
> It seems so. Would you be willing to file this report
> as a Savannah ticket?
Do not remove the warnings. They are not a bug.
Here is how .ie and .el work:
* .ie evaluates its condition "c" and pushes "not(c)" onto a
stack. The
Hi, Tadziu!
At 2021-03-20T17:03:52+0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > > in spite of the warnings. Are the warnings a bug?
>
> > It seems so. Would you be willing to file this report
> > as a Savannah ticket?
>
> Do not remove the warnings. They are not a bug.
Thank you for this writeup. It
Hi, Dave!
At 2021-03-19T01:42:38-0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> Branden, is this a misstatement, or do you think .ss *should* behave
> differently in fill mode vs no-fill mode? There's no historical
> (pre-groff) behavior in play here, since the second .ss parameter is a
> groff invention; however, a
