At 2020-10-14T15:45:16+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the second portability issue that killed the build for me.
> Again, i'm looking for an OK to push the fix.
>
> Since i have little experience with C++, please check that the fix is
> correct and matches your intent.
TL;DR: LGTM,
Hi,
here is the third fatal build error i encountered while trying to
build from git on OpenBSD, this time caused by the recent gnulib
update.
I'm looking for an OK to push the patch appended below.
I think it can (and should) go in before release because
including "config.h" in a few additional
Hi Branden,
G. Branden Robinson wrote on Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:34:28PM +1100:
> At 2020-10-14T15:45:16+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> this is the second portability issue that killed the build for me.
>> Again, i'm looking for an OK to push the fix.
>>
>> Since i have little experience with C++
Hi Bertrand,
Bertrand Garrigues via wrote on Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:03:44AM +0200:
> On Mon, Oct 12 2020 at 06:08:27 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> A major problem with gnulib emerged just now that we should perhaps
>> treat as a blocker.
> [...]
>> The code in
>>
>> gnulib/lib/vasnprintf.c
>>
>
Hello alls,
I'm a neatroff user, and feels, as a result, compelled to give my
opinion. I'll second everyone stating that "Nroff/Troff User Manual"
(CSTR 54) is the manual of choice. It's 37 pages of well written
documentation, and should cover all your needs:
https://www.troff.org/54.pdf
Then, yo
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> I'm looking for an OK to push the patch appended below.
> I think it can (and should) go in before release because
> including "config.h" in a few additional files is unlikely
> to cause regressions with compilers that do not require
Hi James
> On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:08 PM, James K. Lowden
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:13:39 -0400
> Federico Lucifredi wrote:
>
>>> For man pages, what you need is knowledge of the man macro package,
>>> originally written by James Clark [...]
>>
>> I removed the ?originally? bit, whi
Damian McGuckin wrote:
>
> The UTP Revival Project recreated the source code because Tim and Sale were
> unable to locate a copy of the original source. It is located at:
>
> http://home.windstream.net/kollar/utp/
>
> What an undertaking!
>
> There is a sentence on that page
>
>
Deri wrote:
> The UTP Revival Project recreated the source code because Tim and
> Sale
>> were unable to locate a copy of the original source. It is located at:
>>
>>http://home.windstream.net/kollar/utp/
>
>
> There is a version with clickable contents and index here:-
>
> https:/
