Eli,
On Sunday, February 24, 2019 7:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> It is a known problem with the Windows console: you cannot reliably
> write UTF-8 encoded text to it using the ANSI/Posix emulation
> functions like 'write', 'printf', and their C++ equivalents, and
> expect the correct display, ev
On February 25, 2019 11:47:43 AM GMT+02:00, Jeff Conrad
wrote:
> Eli,
>
> On Sunday, February 24, 2019 7:53 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > It is a known problem with the Windows console: you cannot reliably
> > write UTF-8 encoded text to it using the ANSI/Posix emulation
> > functions like 'wr
On Monday, February 25, 2019 2:09 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> What exactly do you mean by "directly to the console"?
Running something like
groff -Tutf8
rather than something like
groff -Tutf8 | more
or
groff -Tutf8 >
Jeff
On February 25, 2019 12:17:19 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Conrad
wrote:
> On Monday, February 25, 2019 2:09 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > What exactly do you mean by "directly to the console"?
>
> Running something like
>
> groff -Tutf8
>
> rather than something like
>
> groff -Tutf8 | mor
Monday, February 25, 2019 2:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Running something like
> >
> > groff -Tutf8
> >
> > rather than something like
> >
> > groff -Tutf8 | more
> >
> > or
> >
> > groff -Tutf8 >
> >
> > Jeff
>
> Yes, I tried all of the above. The last method ends up with co
On February 25, 2019 1:44:07 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Conrad
wrote:
> Monday, February 25, 2019 2:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > > Running something like
> > >
> > > groff -Tutf8
> > >
> > > rather than something like
> > >
> > > groff -Tutf8 | more
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > groff -T
On Monday, February 25, 2019 4:03 AM, Eli Zaretskii:
> The only explanation I could come up with regarding your simple program is
> that VS linked it against static libraries,
I’m sure I’m linking statically.
> In any case, the conclusion remains that UTF-8 console output on Windows is
> unrelia
> From: Jeff Conrad
> CC: "groff@gnu.org"
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:12:39 +
>
> On Monday, February 25, 2019 4:03 AM, Eli Zaretskii:
>
> > The only explanation I could come up with regarding your simple program is
> > that VS linked it against static libraries,
>
> I’m sure I’m linking s
Hi Jeff,
> Would it then make sense to include a devcp1252, which—though it may
> make purists nauseous—would at least give reasonable, reliable output
> for a high percentage of documents?
I don't have any valid input to that, but to wonder if there's an
recode(1) or iconv(1) available to you fo
On Monday, February 25, 2019 7:58 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> You can verify the results with a dependency walker:
>
> http://www.dependencywalker.com/
>
> Or, if you have GNU Binutils, you do this:
>
> objdump -x PROGRAM.exe | fgrep "DLL Name:"
>
> where PROGRAM.exe is your test program.
On Monday, February 25, 2019 7:51 AM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
Hi Ralph,
> > Would it then make sense to include a devcp1252
>
> I don't have any valid input to that, but to wonder if there's an
> recode(1) or iconv(1) available to you for translating to CP 1252 or
> transliterating to UCS-2BE with
11 matches
Mail list logo