> Hello: this is a bug?
[snip]
Where do you see a bug?
man 7 groff:
.substring xx n1 n2
Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
the indices n1 and n2.
groff:
.ds x abc
.substring x 0 1
.tm \*x
--> ab
.ds x abc
.substring x 0 0
.tm \*x
--> a
Hi,
Tadziu Hoffmann wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:20:54PM +0100:
> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>> Hello: this is a bug?
> [snip]
> Where do you see a bug?
>
> man 7 groff:
>
> .substring xx n1 n2
> Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
> the indices n1 and n2.
The
Hello: this is a bug?
$ print ".ds x abc\n.substring x 0 1\n.if '\*x'a' .tm x true for 0 1\n" |
troff -a
$ print ".ds x abc\n.substring x 0 0\n.if '\*x'a' .tm x true for 0 0\n" |
troff -a
x true for 0 0
--steffen
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:09:08PM +0100:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Tadziu Hoffmann wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:20:54PM +0100:
>>> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Where do you see a bug?
>>>
>>> man 7 groff:
>>>
>>> .substring xx n1 n2
>>>
Hi Steffen,
> > > Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
> > > the indices n1 and n2.
> >
> > Maybe:
> >
> > Replace the string named xx with its substring beginning with
> > the zero-based index n1 and ending with index n2, inclusively.
>
> Inclusive index n2 of
Hi Ingo,
> you force every other implementation to follow, so everybody loses.
No, it might apply a little pressure to do so, but I'd assume groff and
most other implementations wouldn't follow. :-)
> While i like some aspects of Perl, lets not adopt the "there's more
> than one way to do it" a
Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
|> Hello: this is a bug?
|[snip]
|
|Where do you see a bug?
|
|man 7 groff:
|
| .substring xx n1 n2
|Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
|the indices n1 and n2.
|
|groff:
|
|.ds x abc
|.substring x 0 1
|.tm \*x
|-->
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:24:22PM +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> > > > Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
> > > > the indices n1 and n2.
> The full documentation of .substring wasn't originally given.
>
> -- Request: .substring str n1 [n2]
>
Hallo all :),
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
|Tadziu Hoffmann wrote on Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:20:54PM +0100:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> [snip]
|
|> Where do you see a bug?
|>
|> man 7 groff:
|>
|> .substring xx n1 n2
|> Replace the string named xx with the substring defined by
|>
Hello Werner, Peter,
On Fri, Nov 07 2014 at 12:58:47 AM, Bertrand Garrigues
wrote:
[...]
> On Fri, Oct 24 2014 at 01:13:27 AM, GregExp wrote:
>> If you want, write it yourself (I suppose, you are french-speaking).
>> Just click on "modifier" on the right, and you can write it down.
>
> Yes I a
> So I've written a very simple example with Mom in French with a
> step-by-step explanation on Ubuntu's French documentation page.
> Could I commit it into contrib/mom/examples so that I could refer to
> this file in the Ubuntu article?
Certainly. Having more examples from different users is ce
Bertrand --
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> So I've written a very simple example with Mom in French with a
> step-by-step explanation on Ubuntu's French documentation page.
> Could I commit it into contrib/mom/examples so that I could refer
> to this file in the Ubuntu article?
12 matches
Mail list logo