> I tried to fix it. Please find my attempt at patching below.
Thanks. Please open a bug tracker and upload a unified diff (`diff
-u'), from old to new. Your context diff is apparently from new to
old, which is hard to read.
> While working on this, I found that "make clean" does not work on m
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Carsten, do you think Heirloom can follow that direction, too?
That would be a TODO task. Heirloom currently does not have the symbols \(lq
and \(rq.
Currently Anthony's patch is applied which had changed \*q to \*(Lq and \*(Rq.
In doc-nroff there is still e.g.:
.ds L
Hi Holger,
> Due to the 'Troff User's Manual' page 24 and the man 7 groff (missing
> a negation)
What's missing?
> the statement:
>
> .if 'str1'str2' anything
>
> cannot handle regular expressions or kinda glob-ing as patterns?
Correct. It's not a simple string compare though, groff's info man
> BTW, do any info experts know how to have info(1) format just that
> node? -n doesn't work to visit that node, it thinks it doesn't
> exist even though it's printing that as the node name. I guess it's
> looking somewhere else for -n.
>
> $ info -n 'Operators in Conditionals' groff
> i
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:16:38 +
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> BTW, do any info experts know how to have info(1) format just that
> node? -n doesn't work to visit that node, it thinks it doesn't exist
> even though it's printing that as the node name. I guess it's looking
> somewhere else for -n.
>
Congratulations :o)
Will it be possible in a while to get the new version on Synaptic?
I'm not used tu compile myself.
Regards
Grégoire
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2014 à 09:15 +0100, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> groff 1.22.3 has been released.
>
> It is available from
>
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/
