Hi Mikkel,
> I use sam2p to convert PNM image to PDF (I can highly recommend the
> small program sam2p). When I later try to find the image bounding box
> using this command
>
> gs -q -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=bbox .pdf 2>&1 \ | grep
> "%%BoundingBox" | cut -d " " -f4,5
>
> Could I see the imag
Ralph wrote:
> lines starting `\#' rather than `.\#'. One or the other might have an
:-) ah okay so I misunderstood how to "out-comment" a line. Funny. I will
change that. Thanks for your tips, it is all very inspiring. Thanks for
taking that closer look on my mombog.mom code.
Mikkel
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:04 +
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> BTW, your mombog.mom had a blank line at the start and the comments
> were lines starting `\#' rather than `.\#'. One or the other might
> have an affect on your attempt at A3 in mom, I don't know.
"\#" is a _groff_ comment, not mom's.
On 03/11/14 20:16, Dale Snell wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:04 +
> Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>> BTW, your mombog.mom had a blank line at the start and the comments
>> were lines starting `\#' rather than `.\#'. One or the other might
>> have an affect on your attempt at A3 in mom, I don't kno
> > That gtroff allows those spaces is an extension to the
> > original troff spec, and in gpic it was simply not
> > implemented to date.
> Maybe I get you wrong, but spaces between . and macronames
> are possible in any *roff. (I don't know if it is written
> in the spec...)
You're right abou
On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:23:32 +
Keith Marshall wrote:
> On 03/11/14 20:16, Dale Snell wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:04 +
> > Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> >> BTW, your mombog.mom had a blank line at the start and the comments
> >> were lines starting `\#' rather than `.\#'. One or the ot
Hi Dale,
Dale Snell wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:21:09PM -0800:
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:23:32 + Keith Marshall wrote:
>> On 03/11/14 20:16, Dale Snell wrote:
>>> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:04 + Ralph Corderoy wrote:
BTW, your mombog.mom had a blank line at the start and the comme
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:32:09 +0100
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Dale Snell wrote on Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:21:09PM -0800:
> > On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:23:32 + Keith Marshall wrote:
> >> On 03/11/14 20:16, Dale Snell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:04 + Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
> |Yes. But generally it can be expected that spaces between \
> |. and a macro name doesn't matter.
>
> I agree with you here.
Just in case it hasn't been mentioned before: At least for the `.so'
request, there is a big difference between
.so
and
.so
The former gets preprocessed
