Hi Ulrich,
> In case of questions, should one ask on the list
I'd say ask here; answers would be part of the public record. These
answers are all based on a quick look; I don't know they're correct.
> However, not so for extract().
node *node_list::extract()
{
node *temp = head
> I am trying to read and understand groff source code, which is - at
> least for me - not easy. In case of questions, should one ask on
> the list or are there specialists who are able and willing to help?
Please ask here.
> And btw. why is node_list in input.cpp but delete_node_list() in
> no
> As long as we keep the --with-appresdir option, packagers would not
> have extra work. As said previously, Arch linux uses
> --with-appresdir=/usr/share/X11/app-defaults, and it seems that
> Debian (https://packages.debian.org/jessie/groff) passes
> --with-appresdir=/etc/X11/app-defaults to conf
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:05:48AM +0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> > In case of questions, should one ask on the list
>
> I'd say ask here; answers would be part of the public record. These
> answers are all based on a quick look; I don't know they're correct.
>
> > However, not
On 21/09/14 15:29, Keith Marshall wrote:
> On 21/09/14 11:52, Deri James wrote:
>> On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library
> function, to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open
> the gate to a possible pdfbb
> I've refactored the appropriate code, in src/roff/troff/input.cpp,
> with a view to accommodating this; see patch attached. While I've
> not yet progressed any implementation for PDF handling, I have
> indicated the point at which it should be invoked. Okay to commit,
> thus far?
This is very
Hello Keith,
Keith Marshall wrote:
|I've refactored the appropriate code, in src/roff/troff/input.cpp, with
|a view to accommodating this; see patch attached. While I've not yet
|progressed any implementation for PDF handling, I have indicated the
|point at which it should be invoked. Okay
On 29/09/14 21:20, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> I've refactored the appropriate code, in src/roff/troff/input.cpp,
>> with a view to accommodating this; see patch attached. While I've
>> not yet progressed any implementation for PDF handling, I have
>> indicated the point at which it should be invo
I agree with Keith. I've often over the years found my plentiful
comments very helpful in going back and reviewing or modifying code.
I even comment a lot of my HTML/XHTML work as well as CSS files so
I can readily skim what I've created and refresh my memory before
attempting useful modificatio
Werner,
On Mon, Sep 29 2014 at 04:55:16 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> As long as we keep the --with-appresdir option, packagers would not
>> have extra work. As said previously, Arch linux uses
>> --with-appresdir=/usr/share/X11/app-defaults, and it seems that
>> Debian (https://packages.debian.or
> -> So, should I try to support this old behavior (looking for
> libX11), or should I directly write something very simple, like
> looking for app-defaults in a few defaults directory like
> /usr/share/X11, /usr/lib/X11, /etc/X11 (this was my first
> intention) ? Note that the possibility
>> This is very nice, thanks! For my taste, the comments are a bit
>> excessive, but I guess this is probably only me who thinks so :-)
>
> I've always favoured a verbose commenting style, since I learned to
> write FORTRAN-66, way back in the early 1970s. Today, with my failing
> 60+ year old m
12 matches
Mail list logo
