> Glad to hear that the heirloom doctools are still being supported with
> bugfixes. Thanks for this Carsten!
I have tried to contact Gunnar many times in several ways without success.
Fixing the bugs has become inevitable now...
> The heirloom refer implementation with lookbib and sortbib is mo
> Von: "Carsten Kunze"
>
> If you have an example for a long table which does not reliable work I would
> be interested to look into this.
>
In the not yet public version of `runoff.7', there is a table consisting of
several pages.
But in groff, it was impossible to use a single table; I had t
Hello groffers !
Carsten Kunze wrote:
> For discussing heirloom troff (and other non-groff
> specific macro packages and tools) a mailing list will be
> set up to not misuse the groff list and annoy groff-only
> list members (further ;).
I'm currently setting up that list: it should be
availab
Could you write a short howto for that (e.g. using spanish as example) ?
That would be helpful for everyone adding a new language.
re
wh
Am 21.08.2014 01:50, schrieb Yves Cloutier:
> I have created hyphen.es and es.tmac and all seems to work!
>
> I exactly wasn't sure what I had to put in es.
> In the not yet public version of `runoff.7', there is a table
> consisting of several pages. But in groff, it was impossible
> to use a single table; I had to split each page as a table of
> its own (both in nroff and troff).
But that is a problem of the man macros, not groff in general.
Norm
Hi Pierre-Jean,
> It appears to Carsten and I that there's place to some coordination
> even if we are working on different projects, with different goals,
> and using different troff implementations.
Would you consider the groff list suitable if the list's owners and
general population of subscr
On 26/08/14 16:38, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
>> In the not yet public version of `runoff.7', there is a table
>> consisting of several pages. But in groff, it was impossible
>> to use a single table; I had to split each page as a table of
>> its own (both in nroff and troff).
>
> But that is a probl
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014, Carsten Kunze wrote:
> For discussing heirloom troff (and other non-groff specific macro
> packages and tools) a mailing list will be set up to not misuse
> the groff list and annoy groff-only list members (further ;).
Please let us know as soon as the list is set up. I (and
On 26-Aug-2014 17:33:07 Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014, Carsten Kunze wrote:
>> For discussing heirloom troff (and other non-groff specific macro
>> packages and tools) a mailing list will be set up to not misuse
>> the groff list and annoy groff-only list members (further ;).
>
> P
Hi,
Ralph Corderoy wrote on Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:59:07PM +0100:
> Pierre-Jean wrote:
>> It appears to Carsten and I that there's place to some coordination
>> even if we are working on different projects, with different goals,
>> and using different troff implementations.
> Would you consider
Hello Walter,
I certainly can. If you don't hear back from me in a couple days, please
remind me, as I'm working on another exciting project at the moment.
Regards,
yves
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:33 AM, walter harms wrote:
> Could you write a short howto for that (e.g. using spanish as exa
> Von: "Tadziu Hoffmann"
>
> > In the not yet public version of `runoff.7', there is a table
> > consisting of several pages. But in groff, it was impossible
> > to use a single table; I had to split each page as a table of
> > its own (both in nroff and troff).
>
> But that is a problem of the
Hello,
- Original Nachricht
Von: Ingo Schwarze
> I can't speak for the list's owners, obviously...
> ... but as a member of the population, i heartily agree with Ralph's
> perspective.
> ... and how few yelled "stop this off-topic crap" the rash spectator
> might already jump to c
>> It appears to Carsten and I that there's place to some coordination
>> even if we are working on different projects, with different goals,
>> and using different troff implementations.
>
> Would you consider the groff list suitable if the list's owners and
> general population of subscribers w
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Would you consider the groff list suitable if the list's owners and
> general population of subscribers were happy? Seems a shame to fragment
> the small, fledgling community.
This was, in fact, our first opinion. But we finally thought
it would be annoying for the groff
Greetings,
Given MM input text:
.nr Hb 0
.nr Hs 0
.nr Hi 0
.H 1 A
.P
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.
.H 2 B
.P
Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their party.
Groff produces output in which the section headers are o
> Could you write a short howto for that (e.g. using spanish as example) ?
>
> That would be helpful for everyone adding a new language.
There's already a file in the groff distribution that explains
localization: tmac/LOCALIZATION. I suggest that
. this file gets distributed
. people add
Hi,
Various Debian developers are working on a long-term project to ensure
that our packages can be built in a byte-for-byte reproducible way.
This makes it easier to do interesting things like defending against
people attempting to attack free software developers' systems; for
example the Tor bro
> 2) Add an option or environment variable or something to suppress
> the inclusion of timestamps.
This is the way to go, I guess.
> For bonus points, set this when building groff's own
> documentation.
Hmm. I rather suggest to provide this as a configuration option so
that builds
19 matches
Mail list logo
