> But the FSFology will not make me sign something that is not legal,
> which is admitted by even the FSFE itself [...]
Well, it would probably have no influence to the jurisdiction in
Germany, but it would have a value for the FSF in the US...
> Just in case you're interested in the thing itsel
Hello Werner,
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
|> But the FSFology will not make me sign something that is not legal,
|> which is admitted by even the FSFE itself [...]
|
|Well, it would probably have no influence to the jurisdiction in
|Germany, but it would have a value for the FSF in the US...
Yes
I have just seen that these comments, which have been gestating
for some time, are somewhat outdated by the appearance of mission
statement 3. Still I think they may be of some use.
Mission statement 2 begins with a precis of what groff is, but no |
overt expression of the purpose of the groff
Doug McIlroy :
> I agree that good candidates for updating the man macros are likely
> to be found among the readership of this mailing list. However,
> the biggest problem with man pages is that people don't write them.
> groff_mom(7) is a recent example--all it does is point somewhere
> else. The
Hi Peter,
Peter Schaffter wrote on Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:40:44PM -0400:
> Subject to a few wording changes (suggestions welcome), this
> represents the final version of the mission statement.
Reading this once and then again a few days later, if find no
more points i would suggest to improve.
