Re: [Groff] I have a git conversion of the repo ready for review.

2013-12-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> If this conversion looks good to you and Werner I'll add a commit to > it describing the conversion process and install it at Savannah. It looks good, thanks a lot! However, there are some issues. 1. The commit entry for 1.10 is groff before CVS: release 1.09 and should obviously

Re: [Groff] I have a git conversion of the repo ready for review.

2013-12-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG : > 1. The commit entry for 1.10 is > > groff before CVS: release 1.09 > > and should obviously be > > groff before CVS: release 1.10 That fix is trivial. It will be in the next attempt. I'm looking into 2, 3, and 4. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr

Re: [Groff] I have a git conversion of the repo ready for review.

2013-12-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG : > 3. The commit bd3759da506a6fc989f9766313f2d38d66e4e1e1 (`Forgot to >commit this file.') exhibits a bug in the conversion: The affected >file (tmac.doc.old) was not part of the first CVS import, but >present in the 1.15 tarball. It seems that the step > > versio

Re: [Groff] I have a git conversion of the repo ready for review.

2013-12-06 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> There you turned up a place where the reposurgeon language needed to > be extended. [...] > > Still working in issues 2 and 4. Thanks! It seems that the conversion of groff's CVS isn't as trivial as thought originally... At least it helps you fix various issues in your tools :-) Werne

Re: [Groff] I have a git conversion of the repo ready for review.

2013-12-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG : > Thanks! It seems that the conversion of groff's CVS isn't as trivial > as thought originally... At least it helps you fix various issues in > your tools :-) Every conversion does that. Even the relatively simple ones. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Ra