Robert Marks writes:
>Actually, how is troff pronounced? Troff? T-roff?
>And groff? Hardly G-roff but possible.
When I first encountered them in the '80s, they were pronounced
n-roff and t-roff, so those names stuck and thus groff became
g-roff when it came along a bit later.
Tet
Hello
this works
\[u u0301] \[a u030A]
but this
\[u u030A] (u with a circle above)
does not.
It is what I currently need.
Please help. It is a Czech word what I ned to write.
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen
Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Hi,
> this works
> \[u u0301] \[a u030A]
>
> but this
> \[u u030A] (u with a circle above)
>
> does not.
> It is what I currently need.
Does this help?
$ nroff <<<'X,u\[u030A],Y' | grep .
X,ů,Y
$
If not, a little example of what's working/failing, like I gave above,
might make
Am Sonntag 28 Juli 2013, 11:30:37 schrieb Ralph Corderoy:
> Hi,
>
> > this works
> > \[u u0301] \[a u030A]
> >
> > but this
> > \[u u030A] (u with a circle above)
> >
> > does not.
> > It is what I currently need.
>
> Does this help?
>
> $ nroff <<<'X,u\[u030A],Y' | grep .
> X,ů,Y
>
Robert Marks wrote:
> So, how is neatroff pronounced?
> Neet-roff? Nia-troff? Nia-T-roff?
I prefer neet-roff; it is easier to pronounce and underlines
that the word neatroff is actually neat + troff.
Ali
Back in the 1980s, I knew an engineer at Bell Labs who used troff
and he always pronounced it tee-roff. All of the people at HP who
used it also pronounced it the same way.
Likewise, at HP, we always prounounced nroff as en-roff, so the
logical way to pronounce groff would be gee-roff.
I've nev
Hi,
> $ nroff <<<'X,\[a u030A],Y' | grep .
> X,å,Y
> $ nroff <<<'X,\[u u030A],Y' | grep .
> :1: warning: can't find special character `u0075_030A'
> X,,Y
>
> If not absolutely necessary, I like to stay with my ISO 8859-1 (-15)
> environment.
Ah, that's your problem. ISO-8859-1 and -15 don't
Am Sonntag 28 Juli 2013, 15:47:58 schrieb Ralph Corderoy:
> Hi,
>
> > $ nroff <<<'X,\[a u030A],Y' | grep .
> > X,å,Y
> > $ nroff <<<'X,\[u u030A],Y' | grep .
> > :1: warning: can't find special character `u0075_030A'
> > X,,Y
> >
> > If not absolutely necessary, I like to stay with my ISO 8859-
> "HO" == Heinz-Jürgen Oertel writes:
HO> If not absolutely necessary, I like to stay with my ISO 8859-1 (-15)
environment.
In a utf-8 locale, nroff defaults to the utf8 device, which is why the
nroff example as written did not work for you.
It seems that you need support for u0075_030A i
Hi,
> > > $ nroff <<<'X,\[a u030A],Y' | grep .
> > > X,å,Y
> > > $ nroff <<<'X,\[u u030A],Y' | grep .
> > > :1: warning: can't find special character `u0075_030A'
> > > X,,Y
> > >
> > > If not absolutely necessary, I like to stay with my ISO 8859-1 (-15)
> > > environment.
> >
> > Ah, that's
Am Sonntag 28 Juli 2013, 13:53:33 schrieb James Cloos:
> > "HO" == Heinz-Jürgen Oertel writes:
>
> HO> If not absolutely necessary, I like to stay with my ISO 8859-1 (-15)
> environment.
>
> In a utf-8 locale, nroff defaults to the utf8 device, which is why the
> nroff example as written d
> If I code the text with \[u u030A] I expect it to be in the PDF.
This glyph is only contained in the URW fonts. For example, try this
with the PDF backend:
.fam U-T
uring: \[u u030A]
Werner
> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG writes:
WL> Th[e] [/uring] glyph is only contained in the URW fonts.
It would be useful were the \[] construct, if the NFC glyph is
unavailable but the NFD constituents are, to use the same mechanism
as \o'' to construct a fallback for the desired glyph.
Also, I see
> It would be useful were the \[] construct, if the NFC glyph is
> unavailable but the NFD constituents are, to use the same mechanism
> as \o'' to construct a fallback for the desired glyph.
Certainly.
> Also, I see that preconv converts ů to \[u016F] and ů to u\[u030A],
> neither of which fal
14 matches
Mail list logo
