Re: [Groff] replacement for col

2012-07-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> > Pass on options to grotty; the following removes all backspaces: >> > >> > groff -ww -Tlatin1 -P-c -P-b -P-o -P-u >> Works fine for me. A nice extension for grotty would be a switch >> for pure/plain that disables all bold, underlines etc. > > You could combine them. -P-cbou Or write

Re: [Groff] replacement for col

2012-07-26 Thread walter harms
Am 26.07.2012 14:17, schrieb Werner LEMBERG: Pass on options to grotty; the following removes all backspaces: groff -ww -Tlatin1 -P-c -P-b -P-o -P-u >>> Works fine for me. A nice extension for grotty would be a switch >>> for pure/plain that disables all bold, underlines etc.

Re: [Groff] replacement for col

2012-07-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> You could combine them. -P-cbou >> >> Or write a simple shell script. > > Actualy I have a simple shell script NTL it would be convenied to > disable all styles at once. If we have a situation similar to GNU's `indent' program where, say, option `-gnu´ is the same as setting the options

Re: [Groff] Included files are not preprocessed

2012-07-26 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> Nevertheless, I think it would be better then to store both > a tmac.-raw file and a preprocessed tmac.. >From what I've read, the old Bell Labs [nt]roff had an option to read macro files in a sort of "compiled" version (to reduce startup time), so if one used this feature it would have been us