On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 11:15:55AM -0500, Steve Izma wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [Groff] groff 1.21 released
> >
> > > > Groffers everywhere, I'm sure, join me in expressing our
> > > > appreciation.
> >
> > > Joined :)
> >
> > Me to
Hi Tadziu,
Am 16.01.2011 um 00:29 schrieb Tadziu Hoffmann:
It's the "]-" macro which prepares for a new reference by
removing all the reference-related strings (which may have
been set by the previous reference), but in e.tmac "[S" is
missing from the list of string names in the definition of
t
> Werner, need a patch for that?
For -me? Yes, please.
Werner
I'd like to suggest that a documentation for EQN is implemented in
groff. Currently, there is only a very short manualy which describes
differences between Groff and Roff EQN. For a useful you have too google
for the original UNIX manpages which are, by the way, only hosted very
sparely over the in
Hi Cedric,
> For a useful you have too google for the original UNIX manpages which
> are, by the way, only hosted very sparely over the internet. And even
> there the documentation of EQN appears to be incomplete.
Are you aware of the original papers on eqn? They're linked to from
http://troff.
On 16-Jan-11 12:29:58, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>
> Hi Cedric,
>
>> For a useful you have too google for the original UNIX manpages which
>> are, by the way, only hosted very sparely over the internet. And even
>> there the documentation of EQN appears to be incomplete.
>
> Are you aware of the ori
Thank you, I've already (after I sent the mail) found the "original
papers", it didn't cross my mind that those could be considered
official references.
They might mention the Nabla and several other features but then,
again, they lack a lot of the rest of EQN (or only of GRoff EQN?).
Either way,
