> This should be fixed in the current CVS (since 2009-Sep-08).
Thanks! (And sorry for not thinking of testing with the
current cvs in the first place.)
> For example, TeX's hyphenation works on glyphs instead of
> characters.
Seems to me like a good idea: two different glyphs for the
same character might have widely differing metrics.
>> For example, TeX's hyphenation works on glyphs instead of
>> characters.
>
> Seems to me like a good idea: two different glyphs for the
> same character might have widely differing metrics.
It's a very bad idea since hyphenation is completely independent from
the used glyphs and fonts!
Perhap
Anyone willing to give my new mmhtml.tmac macros a test? You have to kick them
off with a line like: groff -mwww -m -mmhtml -Thtml sources
That'll get you html outputs. I worked on the lists only, because that was what
was bugging me.
I'm willing to listen to nearly any complaint ... I only work
Chuck Robey wrote:
> Anyone willing to give my new mmhtml.tmac macros a test? You have to kick
> them
> off with a line like: groff -mwww -m -mmhtml -Thtml sources
> That'll get you html outputs. I worked on the lists only, because that was
> what
> was bugging me.
>
> I'm willing to listen to
I found (by putting in a larger document into it for testing) that my AL list
might have been screwing up the index number for the 2nd (or later) portions of
embedded AL lists. I *think* I have it fixed, at least with the doc I'm now
using for testing, so I'm attaching it here.
.\" Adapting th
