Re: [Groff] Fw: problem with pic

2008-08-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > I think I have updated grap to stop putting out the construct in > > question (the "line from (x,y) then down" thing). Can you take a > > look at the pre-release at > > http://www.lunabase.org/~faber/Vault/software/grap/grap-1.42.tar.gz > > and see if it works properly for you? > > Please te

[Groff] Is this a bug?

2008-08-20 Thread Clarke Echols
I ran into an interesting "behavior" this morning... Here is the offending text: .H3 "\f2.\^.\^.including 21 examples" Macro H3 is defined as: . de H3 . ce 1 . ft HB . ce 1 \\$1 . ft 1 .. I get an error because groff is interpreting the first dot in .\^.\^. as the first character in the

Re: [Groff] Is this a bug?

2008-08-20 Thread Mike Bianchi
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 07:29:16AM -0500, Clarke Echols wrote: > I ran into an interesting "behavior" this morning... > > > Here is the offending text: > > .H3 "\f2.\^.\^.including 21 examples" > > Macro H3 is defined as: > > . de H3 > . ce 1 > . ft HB > . ce 1 > \\$1 > . ft 1 > .. > > I get a

[Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Ted Harding
Hi Folks, The following does not come out as I would expect (formatting with groff -t -ms ): .LP .TS centre tab(#); c. \fB\s[24]ZIMBABWE\s0\fP \f[BI]\s[18]Translation\s0\fP .T& l. \s[18]God bless Africa, Let her fame spread far and wide Hear our prayer: May God bless us! Come, Spirit,

RE: [Groff] Fw: problem with pic

2008-08-20 Thread Y T
I had an example where grap 1.41 was incompatible with post-1.19.2 pic. This example now works correctly with grap 1.42 and a relatively recent (Feb 08) version of pic. Hence, it appears that the problem has been solved. Thanks! > Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:41:56 +0200 > To: groff@gnu.org; [EMAI

Re: [Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> The following does not come out as I would expect [snip] After a bit of experimentation (use option "allbox" to make the widths visible) I believe the behavior can be explained as follows: For calculating the cell widths, all cell contents are inspected *independently*. Thus, the apparently l

Re: [Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Ted Harding
On 20-Aug-08 17:47:47, Tadziu Hoffmann wrote: >> The following does not come out as I would expect > [snip] > After a bit of experimentation (use option "allbox" to make the > widths visible) I believe the behavior can be explained as > follows: > > For calculating the cell widths, all cell conten

Re: [Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> After a bit of experimentation (use option "allbox" to make the > widths visible) I believe the behavior can be explained as > follows: > > For calculating the cell widths, all cell contents are inspected > *independently*. Thus, the apparently longest line ("Let her > fame spread far and wide

Re: [Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Namely: tbl often has to cope with stuff that no-one can know > the length of until troff has finished with it. In particular, > equations entered using things like ${x + y} over {u + w}$. > > Now, tbl does have a mechanism for creating number-registers > which will be evaluated by troff, precis

Re: [Groff] ?Bug in tbl?

2008-08-20 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> I tried setting the point-size in the column specifiers > (to force tbl to know the font-size), and this worked: [snip] How about this?: .ps 18 .vs 24 .TS centre; cBp24 cfBI l. ZIMBABWE .sp .5 Translation .sp .5 God bless Africa, Let her fame spread far and wide Hear our prayer: May God bless