___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
Gunnar
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grof
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
On 26-Jan-07 Gunnar Ritter wrote:
>> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
>
> This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
> a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
I'm sorely tempted to agree with this!
My blood-pressure (normally healthily low) has been rising
On 2007.01.27 03:14 Ted Harding wrote:
My blood-pressure (normally healthily low) has
been rising rapidly over the last few days ...
Gee Ted, aren't you proud that you have taken over from Werner as the
porn king of groff? The rest of us are envious.
:-)
Robert Thorsby
> This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
> a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of
them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing lists -- maybe there is
something I can do on my side, but I don'
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 23:05 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > This filtering component is stupid. Why doesn't it discard
> > a message after it has deleted all content anyway?
>
> Good question. Most of the spam is automatically deleted, but some of
> them apparently not. I'm very bad in managing
> The problem we are seeing is that after all the parts have been
> removed, there is still a non-empty signature text piece left ... so
> the message is not discarded. BUT ... that signature is added by
> mailman itself!
I've now removed the mailing list footer. Thanks for your help -- I
would
27 matches
Mail list logo