> When used in a diversion for placement within a table cell, PSPIC's
> positioning option [-L | -R | -I n ] works IMHO in a somewhat
> unusual manner. The options L, R and nothing (= center) place the
> image with reference to the overall line length (or maybe page
> width, I'm not sure) and _not
> .\" In PSPIC, move current point to the right edge of the image
> .\" so that the macro used in a diversion produces a correct width
> .\" for the image.
> .am PSPIC
> . nop \h'(\\n[ps-offset]u + \\n[ps-deswid]u)'
> . sp -1
> ..
I wonder whether I shall modify .PSPIC to always do that. Comme
Dear list,
I have been groff-ing for some time now, and have been
primarily interested in the mom macro package. However, I have
some questions to ask about groff font structure for PostScript
output.
1) The UnderlinePosition and UnderlineThickness values from the
afm files are discar
> 1) The UnderlinePosition and UnderlineThickness values from the
> afm files are discarded by afmtodit. There is nothing
> corresponding to the in the groff devps font files. How is
> groff then expected to provide proper underlining to text?
Of all output formats groff is supporti
