> I just ran a build of this prerelease on my Win32/MSYS box. Two
> problems, both associated with either pdfroff or pdfmark.
>
> 1) Building in /d/local/test/build (/d/ is MSYS notion of what Win32
>calls drive D:/), the build blows up, apparently passing a -D
>option to groff, when pdf
The file /doc/fdl.texi contains the old version 1.1 of the FDL.
The actual version 1.2 can be get from
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/fdl.texi
Bernd Warken
__
Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min.
weltweit telefo
Time Freedom ,do you want?
I will tell you how to do?
http://home.kimo.com.tw/mannarich01/
==
?X$'7H?q3S
___
Bug-groff mailing list
Bug-groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff
Debian has many troubles with the Free Documentation License (FDL).
You can get details at
http://people.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
The email for the discussion about the FDL is
debian-legal_at_lists.debian.org
where `_at_' is `@'.
The autoconf package writes
Documenta
On Saturday 28 May 2005 8:14 am, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> BTW, there is another serious problem while compiling pdfmark.pdf:
>
> ./pdfroff: : cannot execute
> ./pdfroff: --style: not found
>
> This happens on various platforms which Nelson has tested. I'm
> waiting for the config.log files to
