On Fri Apr 1 23:42:51 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 01-Apr-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
...
> >
> > In contemporary North American bibliographies, about five
> > styles are "standard", though by no means the only ones used:
> >
> > AMA (American Medical Association)
> > APA
> > I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
> > refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
> > bibliographic rules.
>
> MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
> status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I have
> n
Mats Broberg wrote:
I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
bibliographic rules.
MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I h
Kees,
Your relocation changes are now in the CVS. I had to do some heavy
hacking to incorporate everything in a clean way. Please test.
Werner
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Fri Apr 1 23:42:51 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 01-Apr-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
> ...
> > >
> > > In contemporary North American bibliographies, about five
> > > styles are "standard", though by no means the only ones used:
> > >
> > >
On Sat Apr 2 10:29:34 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I wrote]
> > MLA seems to be "Modern Language Association". What kind of
> > status (official or unofficial) does this style have? I have
> > never heard about it or seen it used.
...
> There are two major academic traditions to deal with bib
