Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>
> Well, if one interprets what Otavio says as "requests and macro
> calls must be at the start of lines", it makes sense to me. It
> .I is
> a bit hard to swallow, if you come from e.g. a TeX background where
> the markup doesn't disturb the flow of the text as much.
Jorgen,
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
Hi.
I got two pornographic-sounding spams today, one apparently from
Werner, the other apparently from Ted Harding. Rather than wait to
see if these are isolated incidents, I'm cut 'n' pasting both
emails with full headers into this post.
I'm not an expert in mail header forensics, but someone e
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
On 31-Mar-05 Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I got two pornographic-sounding spams today, one apparently from
> Werner, the other apparently from Ted Harding. Rather than wait to
> see if these are isolated incidents, I'm cut 'n' pasting both
> emails with full headers into this post.
>
> I'm n
I didn't know this sort of spoofing was still
possible. I remember I used to impress friends by
sending them emails as [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a
kid :)
The only thing you could reasonably do is press the
smtp admins to put up authentication, start logging,
accept messages from users with a certain em
Ted --
Thanks for the info you provided.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005, Ted Harding wrote:
> I don't know what to suggest about it. It's extremely
> irritating, and could be misinterpreted by people who don't
> understand how it works, leaving a few of us with bad
> reputations! What's intriguing is that
I sent Peter's mail to one of our malware specialists at Trend Micro.
This is his response:
--
This is where the problem with most mailing lists comes in.
Most mailing lists prevent outsiders from posting messages but insiders can pos
Peter Schaffter wrote:
I got two pornographic-sounding spams today, one apparently from
Werner, the other apparently from Ted Harding. Rather than wait to
see if these are isolated incidents, I'm cut 'n' pasting both
emails with full headers into this post.
Yup, I noticed they came back in the las
Hi.
I've begun work on adding refer capabilities to mom. Using the ms
refer module as a starting point, I'm setting mom up to use MLA
bibliographic rules.
It's going well, but I've encountered a small (and I do mean small)
snag. MLA rules state that when you have two authors, a comma
should com
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:22:08PM -0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > Blow, Joe, and John Doe
> > ^
> >
> > By default, refer produces
> >
> > Blow, Joe and John Doe
> >
> > I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:22:08PM -0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> Blow, Joe, and John Doe
> ^
>
> By default, refer produces
>
> Blow, Joe and John Doe
>
> I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this.
I don't know if this helps, but in a document, it can be done as
.R1
On Apr 1, 2005 8:22 AM, Peter Schaffter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone knows a way around this, short of changing
> refer.cpp's
>
> string join_authors_exactly_two = " and ";
>
> assertion to
>
> string join_authors_exactly_two = ", and ";
>
> I'd prefer to state
On Apr 1, 2005 10:30 AM, Wartan Hachaturow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know, I write in Russian, and having an "and" in a reference
> doesn't help much, if it's a
> Russian reference ;)
Uh-oh. It's not really hardcoded -- treat this letter as an April joke :)
--
Regards, Wartan.
_
15 matches
Mail list logo
