Hi Colin,
> Really, the weird thing is not so much the existence of the current
> symlink, as the fact that the directories under $(dataprogramdir) are
> versioned.
True.
> but it's quite possible that it would have been better to abolish the
> versioned directories.
And not too late?
> Anyway
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:28:43PM +, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> (Actually, the existence of /usr/share/groff/current seems a bit odd.
> Most packages don't have a symbolic link to support multiple installed
> versions and users that want multiple versions of a program installed
> can use GNU Stow
Hi Doug,
> I run groff in windows (cygwin) and linux (redhat).
> Groff's appearance in /usr/share is surprisingly
> different in the two environments.
>
> cygwin:
> groff
> 1.22.4 current site-tmac
> doc
> groff-1.22.4
> pic.ps
>
> linux:
> groff
> 1.22.
I run groff in windows (cygwin) and linux (redhat).
Groff's appearance in /usr/share is surprisingly
different in the two environments.
cygwin:
groff
1.22.4 current site-tmac
doc
groff-1.22.4
pic.ps
linux:
groff
1.22.3 current site-tmac
doc
