At 2024-10-17T19:27:08+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > It would be more illuminating to note that "test-nroff" is a script
> > of your creation that does not, and has not ever, existed in GNU
> > groff.
> >
> The fate of "test-nroff" was decided in bug #55941.
Yes. I don't think any of t
On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 08:31:20PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Bjarni,
>
> At 2024-10-07T23:00:59+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > Package: groff
> > Version: upstream, GIT HEAD
> > Severity: minor
> > Tags: patch
>
> If this were a Savannah ticket I would close it as "Invalid"
> imm
> > "printf '%s\n%s\n' '.kern 0' '.ss 12 0' | groff -mandoc -Z - "
>
> [...]
> The foregoing is also revealing of a low level of sophistication with
> printf(1).
True. But why harness marginal feaures for such small benefit? Unrewarding
sophistication should be disparaged, not flaunted. I would s
[re-sending, slightly modified, to list]
Hi onf,
At 2024-10-09T00:04:07+0200, onf wrote:
> On Tue Oct 8, 2024 at 3:31 AM CEST, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > At 2024-10-07T23:00:59+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > "printf '%s\n%s\n' '.kern 0' '.ss 12 0' | groff -m
On Tue Oct 8, 2024 at 3:31 AM CEST, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
>
> At 2024-10-07T23:00:59+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> > [...]
> > "printf '%s\n%s\n' '.kern 0' '.ss 12 0' | groff -mandoc -Z - "
>
> [...]
> The foregoing is also revealing of a low level of sophistication with
> printf
Bjarni,
At 2024-10-07T23:00:59+, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> Package: groff
> Version: upstream, GIT HEAD
> Severity: minor
> Tags: patch
If this were a Savannah ticket I would close it as "Invalid"
immediately.
"Unreproducible" also applies.
>* What led up to the situation?
>
>
