Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-23T11:32:02+, Deri wrote:
> Just to be sure, can you confirm your intention is to return .device
> to its 1.23.0 state, and mirror that behaviour for \X,
Yes, that is my intention.
> so we will have no more red seepage.
Not sure what that is, so I can't promise it. Does
On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 02:46:50 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [self-follow-up]
>
> > Or: Should device control commands affect the environment?
> >
> > Recall the definition of the \X escape sequence from CSTR #54 (1992).
> >
> > 10.7. Transparent output. The sequence \X'anything' copi
[self-follow-up]
> Or: Should device control commands affect the environment?
>
> Recall the definition of the \X escape sequence from CSTR #54 (1992).
>
> 10.7. Transparent output. The sequence \X'anything' copies anything
> to the output, as a device control function of the form x X anythi
Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-20T21:03:15+, Deri wrote:
> On Saturday, 20 January 2024 01:39:21 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[snip]
> > x X ps: exec [4849204445524920F09F9888 pdfmark2
> >
> > Something pretty close to that works on the deri-gropdf-ng branch
> > today, as I understand it.
>
> I'm afr
Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-20T21:03:11+, Deri wrote:
> > can't transparently output node at top level
> >
> > But the reason 1.23.0 doesn't throw these errors is because I hid
> > them, not because we fixed them.[7]
>
> It might be worth clarifying what this caused this error to appear
> (befor
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 00:56:34 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Deri,
>
> At 2024-01-20T00:07:21+, Deri wrote:
> > On Friday, 19 January 2024 21:39:57 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Right. Before I craft a lengthy response to this--did you see the
> > > footnote?
> >
> > Yes,
On Saturday, 20 January 2024 01:39:21 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [self-follow-up with correction]
>
> At 2024-01-19T18:56:37-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This might be more accurately stated as:
> >
> > 2) \X behaves like .device used to (in groff 1.23.0 and earlier).
>
> [correcti
[self-follow-up with correction]
At 2024-01-19T18:56:37-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> This might be more accurately stated as:
>
> 2) \X behaves like .device used to (in groff 1.23.0 and earlier).
[correction follows]
And I repeat: this is _NOT_ a _hard_ prerequisite to expressing Unicode
s
Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-20T00:07:21+, Deri wrote:
> On Friday, 19 January 2024 21:39:57 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Right. Before I craft a lengthy response to this--did you see the
> > footnote?
>
> Yes, sorry, it didn't help. I'm just comparing output now with output
> in 1.23.0 and wha
On Friday, 19 January 2024 21:39:57 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Deri,
>
> At 2024-01-19T21:16:54+, Deri wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 19:22:48 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Or: Should device control commands affect the environment?
> > >
> > > I therefore propose to ch
Hi Deri,
At 2024-01-19T21:16:54+, Deri wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 19:22:48 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Or: Should device control commands affect the environment?
> >
> > I therefore propose to change this, and have the `\X` escape sequence
> > read its argument in copy mode.
On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 19:22:48 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Or: Should device control commands affect the environment?
>
...
> I therefore propose to change this, and have the `\X` escape sequence
> read its argument in copy mode. That will make it work like the
> `device` request in g
>
> This assumes you know both the desired font and the desired colour, which
> might be defined at other places in the document and not under your control.
Yeah, I know. I was trying to gauge how Groff's escape sequences might
benefit an \X'…' sequence, and the PostScript I gave was a
contrived
> > \fB\s(12\m[red]\X'ps: big bold red text in my device command'\fP
> \X'ps: exec 1.0 0 0 setrgbcolor /Times-Bold findfont \n[.s] scalefont setfont
> (Text) show'
This assumes you know both the desired font and the desired
color, which might be defined at other places in the document
and not u
Hi John,
At 2024-01-18T00:32:04+1100, John Gardner wrote:
> So instead of:
> > \X'ps: \fB\s(12\m[red]big bold red text in my device command\fP'
> >
> > one would write:
> > \fB\s(12\m[red]\X'ps: big bold red text in my device command'\fP
>
> I believe you meant to provide an example more like thi
Hi Branden,
So instead of:
> \X'ps: \fB\s(12\m[red]big bold red text in my device command\fP'
>
> one would write:
> \fB\s(12\m[red]\X'ps: big bold red text in my device command'\fP
I believe you meant to provide an example more like this?
\X'ps: exec 1.0 0 0 setrgbcolor /Times-Bold findfont \n
16 matches
Mail list logo