Re: [Groff] Tables in .ig/.. blocks not ignored

2006-07-27 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
It works if you use ".ig xx" paired with ".xx" (substitute some reasonable name for xx if you like; make sure its defined as a no-op). Explanation: this is like nested definitions, .de xx .de yy hello \\.. .. where you have to "hide" the inner terminating "..", so that when defining x

Re: [Groff] Tables in .ig/.. blocks not ignored

2006-07-26 Thread Clarke Echols
Sounds like a bug in tbl. It's looking at .TS and .TE, but not catching .ig requests. I've never used classic troff that way, so I don't know how it handles such a construct. Adding a .\" in front of the .TS as in .\".TS should do the job. With no .TS, tbl probably ignores the .TE. Not the c