Re: [Groff] Re: Groff, Grohtml and Encodings

2010-10-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> I tried adding a new line to ...\font\devutf8\r: >> >> u0410 24 0 0x411 >> >> deliberately incrementing the device code by one, >> and it did work! > > Doing this you are overriding the default mapping built into > grohtml. ^^^ This is a typo, of course. I mean the utf8 device

Re: [Groff] Re: Groff, Grohtml and Encodings

2010-10-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I tried adding a new line to ...\font\devutf8\r: > > u0410 24 0 0x411 > > deliberately incrementing the device code by one, > and it did work! Doing this you are overriding the default mapping built into grohtml. > Why doesn't the same action (when tested with the same input file) > w

Re: [Groff] Re: Groff, Grohtml and Encodings

2010-10-17 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Now I am trying to understand a very simple case: for the latin1 > device, no font definition contains a glyph named [`A], ??? I have this line in font/devlatin1/R: `A 24 0 0300 Werner