> In your update to eqn.man, I see: [...]
Fixed, thanks.
Werner
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 07:53:54 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > So I suggest that the "cure" (strictly speaking a prophylactic)
> > is simply to include a statement in eqn and tbl documentation
> > saying that the use of "delim ##" for eqn will clash with tbl,
> > say under "INTERACTION WITH EQN" i
> So I suggest that the "cure" (strictly speaking a prophylactic) is
> simply to include a statement in eqn and tbl documentation saying
> that the use of "delim ##" for eqn will clash with tbl, say under
> "INTERACTION WITH EQN" in 'man tbl'. There are at present no such
> warnings in 'man eqn'!
On 26-Oct-09 08:15:04, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> This is an interesting question. It seems that this is a generic
> limitation even present with AT&T. Can someone confirm and/or
> comment?
> Werner
Interesting indeed! Iit is clear that Michael Cain's explanation
(quoted below along with the or
