Re: [Groff] Eqn, tbl and groff characters

2007-04-03 Thread Frank Jahnke
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 17:08 -0400, M Bianchi wrote: > so presumably > .EQ > delim && > .EN > > allows one to use $10 \[mu] &alpha sub i& in line. That's interesting. As a rule I avoid using "&" since it has Unix meaning. Apparently it has none to groff. That's good t

RE: [Groff] Eqn, tbl and groff characters

2007-04-03 Thread Frank Jahnke
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 19:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No problem: Just use \[Do] = \(Do for the dollar sign in text, > and keep $$ for inline equations! (This is what I always do. > Mind you, I have less use for $$ as money than for $$ in eqn. > It's different with ££ of course ... ). Tha

RE: [Groff] Eqn, tbl and groff characters

2007-04-03 Thread Ted Harding
On 03-Apr-07 03:11:26, Frank Jahnke wrote: > I am submitting a proposal that contains equations, tables and US $ > signs. What character would list members suggest I use for in-line > equations? The # character is used internally within tbl and I have > equations in tables so I cannot use #. I w

Re: [Groff] Eqn, tbl and groff characters

2007-04-03 Thread Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
Am Dienstag, 3. April 2007 05:11 schrieb Frank Jahnke: > I am submitting a proposal that contains equations, tables and US $ > signs. What character would list members suggest I use for in-line > equations? The # character is used internally within tbl and I have > equations in tables so I cannot