Re: Proposed v2: an eqn keyword change: gfont -> gifont

2023-04-11 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2023-04-11T14:37:51+0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > I see groff's documentation has Roman numerals but roman fonts. Yes, that's a long-standing practice I haven't yet seen fit to deviate from. ;-) 3af475486f doc/groff.texinfo (Werner LEMBERG 2001-03-23 23:07:51 + 454) @c Note: We sa

Re: Proposed v2: an eqn keyword change: gfont -> gifont

2023-04-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
You type ‘s’ and spot an error. > The bold font is used by the bold primitive. The bold primitive uses the bold font. -- Cheers, Ralph.

Re: Proposed v2: an eqn keyword change: gfont -> gifont

2023-04-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Branden, > Further feedback is welcome. I see groff's documentation has Roman numerals but roman fonts. I try to parse roman as something+man. :-) > Fonts > eqn uses up to three typefaces to set an equation: an italic face > for letters, a roman face for everything else, and a bold

Proposed v2: an eqn keyword change: gfont -> gifont

2023-04-09 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Thanks to Damian, Ralph, and Doug for the feedback. At 2023-04-08T15:54:55+1000, Damian McGuckin wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > Crazy? Sensible? A long time coming? > > Answers areL No. Yes. At long last. > > The fix does not look quite right but maybe my brain