The proposal is clean and well defended.
Perfecting tweaks for the proposed man page:
1. Delete the parenthesized remark about boldface. At best it is TMI,
at worst, condescending.
2. To parallel the phrase "to be set in italic", delete "type" from
"to be set in roman type".
3. Delete the last
Hi Branden,
> gbfont f
> Set the bold font to f.
>
> gifont f
> Set the italic font to f.
>
> grfont f
> Set the roman font to f.
>
> For AT&T eqn compatibility, gfont is recognized as a synonym for
> gifont.
gbfont f
Set the bold font to f.
On Fri, 7 Apr 2023, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Crazy? Sensible? A long time coming?
Answers areL No. Yes. At long last.
The fix does not look quite right but maybe my brain is not switched on.
Thanks - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International . 20D Grose St, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:
Hi folks,
I've got the following worked up and was wondering who had support for
or objections to it. I filed a Savannah ticket for it on 27 March.[1]
This isn't for 1.23.0--just something I put together on while Bertrand
evaluates a pile of changes for possible inclusion in RC4.[2]
New man pag
