On 11/1/21, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> or until we can devise
> some contributor-facing documentation that tells us all what is expected
> and how to perform routine tasks like branch creation, management
> (without blitzing the -commit list), and deletion.
I have no stake in this, as I'm not r
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:20:03AM +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> You absolutely _did_ rewrite history ... not just once, but twice!
> >> You deleted an _entire branch_ of published development history,
> >> then after my subsequent push had reinstated it, you deleted it
> >> once again! If
>> You absolutely _did_ rewrite history ... not just once, but twice!
>> You deleted an _entire branch_ of published development history,
>> then after my subsequent push had reinstated it, you deleted it
>> once again! If that isn't rewriting history, then I'd like to know
>> what you would call
At 2021-11-01T22:30:28+, Keith Marshall via Groff-commit wrote:
> On 01/11/2021 14:01, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At 2021-10-24T18:53:52-0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:58:55AM +1100, G. Branden Robinson
> >> wrote:
> >>> Since I am now accused four times over of re
On 01/11/2021 14:01, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2021-10-24T18:53:52-0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:58:55AM +1100, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>>> Since I am now accused four times over of rewriting history, and
>>> moreover of violating an "absolute taboo", I must insist
Hi, Larry!
At 2021-10-24T18:53:52-0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:58:55AM +1100, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Since I am now accused four times over of rewriting history, and
> > moreover of violating an "absolute taboo", I must insist upon the
> > presentation of particula
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:58:55AM +1100, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > +1 except in extraordinary circumstances.
>
> Since I am now accused four times over of rewriting history, and
> moreover of violating an "absolute taboo", I must insist upon the
> presentation of particulars.
Hi, I'm the Bi
I had a longer response to this, but it's probably better to cut to the
chase. First I'll quote the charge sheet.
At 2021-10-24T20:35:44+0100, Keith Marshall wrote:
> to push the first change in my local patch queue ... and incidentally,
> (and unexpectedly), restore the public repository history
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 08:35:44PM +0100, Keith Marshall wrote:
> What you describe may be a manifest *effect* of the problem; the *real*
> problem is that, contrary to established wisdom, you've abused git's
> ability to rewrite history, within a public repository ??? that should be
> an absolute
On 24/10/2021 03:16, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Here's another long email; Ralph may want to skip it.]
> At 2021-10-23T22:07:27+0100, Keith Marshall via Groff-commit wrote:
>> Well, I pulled, and updated my local tree, to capture Brandon's most
>> recent commits, then applied _one_ trivial ms pa
[Here's another long email; Ralph may want to skip it.]
Hi Keith,
At 2021-10-23T22:07:27+0100, Keith Marshall via Groff-commit wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I have no idea what's happened here!
[...]
> Well, I pulled, and updated my local tree, to capture Brandon's most
> recent commits, then applied _one_
11 matches
Mail list logo
