Re: GNU Coding Standards for progname:file:line. (Was: Font path issue)

2022-08-22 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Branden, On 8/23/22 00:08, G. Branden Robinson wrote: Hi Alex, At 2022-08-22T20:18:38+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: Also, I'd keep the space, even if only for being able to use standard tools like perror(3), or common tools like the functions. Maybe I'm having a senior moment but I don'

Re: GNU Coding Standards for progname:file:line. (Was: Font path issue)

2022-08-22 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Alex, At 2022-08-22T20:18:38+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Also, I'd keep the space, even if only for being able to use standard > tools like perror(3), or common tools like the functions. Maybe I'm having a senior moment but I don't get what this has to do with groff? groff rolls its own

Re: GNU Coding Standards for progname:file:line. (Was: Font path issue)

2022-08-22 Thread Alejandro Colomar
Hi Ralph, Branden, On 8/22/22 10:04, Ralph Corderoy wrote: Hi Branden, (B) I see a deviation from the GNU Coding Standards for diagnostic messages; we don't need a space after "troff:" when it's followed by a file name. It seems much of the word doesn't comply $ sed -f /etc/p

GNU Coding Standards for progname:file:line. (Was: Font path issue)

2022-08-22 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Branden, > (B) I see a deviation from the GNU Coding Standards for diagnostic > messages; we don't need a space after "troff:" when it's followed > by a file name. It seems much of the word doesn't comply $ sed -f /etc/passwd sed: file /etc/passwd line 3: extra characters afte