Hi Dave,
you hit a weak spot. I've never intentionally worked with groff backend
options (except for paper size) before, and I *should* have noticed that
the switch -e calls eqn, and nothing but that.
Only after having copied Deri's command line, I started to recognize my
ignorance. The files cl
On 12/18/23, Oliver Corff via wrote:
> I tried to compile my minimal document again, with all combinations of
> -e, -F /usr/share/fonts/urw35-base/ but nothing changes. The PDF file is
> always 11771 bytes long. Embedding a font or a glyph should make a
> difference, or not?
Embedding a font will
On Monday, 18 December 2023 21:49:55 GMT Oliver Corff wrote:
> Hi Deri,
>
> Here we go. In the meantime I came to the conclusion that the dpdviewer
> is at fault, or rather the viewer's setup; I forwarded the pdf to a
> different system, and there everything was visible as intended.
>
> Best rega
Hi Alexis,
thank your for the quick pointer! I was totally unaware of that system.
And, in addition, I wonder why evince and okular attempt start as root,
id -a shows that I am in my non-privileged group, working in my regular
shell.
Still wondering *why* the viewers want to connect to a socket
Oliver Corff via writes:
when starting evince I get
the message
Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to
socket
/root/.cache/at-spi/bus_0: Permission denied
Never seen this before, I even do not know what at-spi is.
Same with okular.
"at-spi" is "Assistive Technology
Hi Deri,
Here we go. In the meantime I came to the conclusion that the dpdviewer
is at fault, or rather the viewer's setup; I forwarded the pdf to a
different system, and there everything was visible as intended.
Best regards, and thank you!
Oliver.
On 18/12/2023 22:34, Deri wrote:
On Monday
On Monday, 18 December 2023 21:07:16 GMT G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > My first question: Is this new behaviour intended?
>
> Probably not. Oddly, not much earlier today, we got a similar report
> from T. Kurt Bond about the URW fonts being troublesome--as in, not
> found--in a groff build fr
On Monday, 18 December 2023 20:57:07 GMT Oliver Corff wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> today I upgraded my system from Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 which has the
> appreciated side-effect that groff 1.23.0 is finally installed by default.
>
> I tested the new installation. As was to be expected, groffer was gone
Hi Branden,
thank you for your quick response!
I had just hit the send button, and the bell rang --- I saw T. Kurt
Bond's incoming mail. What a coincidence.
On 18/12/2023 22:07, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi Oliver,
At 2023-12-18T21:57:07+0100, Oliver Corff wrote:
Enter groff 1.23.0. I compi
Hi Oliver,
At 2023-12-18T21:57:07+0100, Oliver Corff wrote:
> Enter groff 1.23.0. I compiled the same file again (a translation which
> I had finished just this morning, not knowing what an escape I had*),
> and alas! things took an unexpected course. First I looked for the
> appearance of ≤ and
Dear All,
today I upgraded my system from Fedora 38 to Fedora 39 which has the
appreciated side-effect that groff 1.23.0 is finally installed by default.
I tested the new installation. As was to be expected, groffer was gone
(I liked it for q&d test runs of code snippets, so I actually miss it.
11 matches
Mail list logo
