Re: [groff] grohtml shortcomings

2018-12-05 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi James, James K. Lowden wrote on Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 11:29:37AM -0500: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 05:40:58 +0100 Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> For PDF output, by all means, use groff, it is much, much better >> than mandoc for that. For mdoc to HTML, don't. > Ingo, my colleague says the man macros EX an

Re: [groff] grohtml shortcomings

2018-12-05 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 05:40:58 +0100 Ingo Schwarze wrote: > For PDF output, by all means, use groff, it is much, much better > than mandoc for that. For mdoc to HTML, don't. Ingo, my colleague says the man macros EX and EE aren't supported on the version of FreeBSD he uses, which I assume is using

Re: [groff] grohtml shortcomings

2018-12-03 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi James, James K. Lowden wrote on Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:46:31PM -0500: > I converted the Heimdal kf.1 page to html recently, and found what I > consider to be problems with both appearance and HTML style. For mdoc(7) input in particular, do not use "groff -mdoc -T html". Use "mandoc -T html

[groff] grohtml shortcomings

2018-12-03 Thread James K. Lowden
I converted the Heimdal kf.1 page to html recently, and found what I consider to be problems with both appearance and HTML style. https://github.com/heimdal/heimdal/blob/1d4ebc0df798cb1d8edca910b806e55c6c19bccb/appl/kf/kf.1 GNU groff version 1.22.3 Command: groff -man -T html man1/kf.1