Re: [Groff] unicode support, part 11: \[sqrt] vs \(sr

2006-02-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > +++ groff-20060217/src/libs/libgroff/glyphuni.cpp > > @@ -398,7 +398,8 @@ > >{ "mi", "2212" }, > >{ "-+", "2213" }, > >{ "**", "2217" }, > > -//{ "sqrt", "221A" }, > > + // \[sqrt] and \(sr are the same. > > + { "sqrt", "221A" }, > >{ "sr", "221A" }, > >{ "pt", "221D" }, >

Re: [Groff] unicode support, part 11: \[sqrt] vs \(sr

2006-02-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> groff_char.man has this: > >(N/A) \[sr]radical u221A square root + >(N/A) \[sqrt] radical u221A *** I've just added the square root (for textual use) glyph from TeX's TC fonts as `sr' to the devdvi font description files. This was a

Re: [Groff] unicode support, part 11: \[sqrt] vs \(sr

2006-02-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Does anyone see a difference between \[sqrt] and \(sr ? `sr' is the text version, `sqrt' a mathematical symbol. > groff_char.man has this: > >(N/A) \[sr]radical u221A square root + >(N/A) \[sqrt] radical u221A *** Ah, I've just com

[Groff] unicode support, part 11: \[sqrt] vs \(sr

2006-02-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Does anyone see a difference between \[sqrt] and \(sr ? Most devices treat them the same. groff_char.man has this: (N/A) \[sr]radical u221A square root + (N/A) \[sqrt] radical u221A *** I propose to treat them the same everywhere. 200