> There are two errors in the ChangeLog entry:
Fixed, thanks.
> Also, I've noticed two small problems with my coding, fixed by the
> attached patch: [...]
Applied.
Werner
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
On Monday 28 February 2005 3:53 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Consequently, I have modified my patch to set AC_PREREQ(2.59), and
> > to use AS_HELP_STRING instead of AC_HELP_STRING throughout.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I've now applied your changes. Please test!
There are two errors in the ChangeLog entry:
> The patch file was also included in the tarball, along with the two
> new files.
Oops! A bug in mc prevented me to see the patch. Very strange.
> Consequently, I have modified my patch to set AC_PREREQ(2.59), and
> to use AS_HELP_STRING instead of AC_HELP_STRING throughout.
Thanks.
I've no
On Sunday 27 February 2005 9:07 am, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > I've attached the update as a tarball containing the two new files,
> > `pdfroff.sh' and `pdfroff.man', together with a patch against the
> > CVS versions on which my additional modifications are based
>
> Only the attachment with the tw
> It's taken a while, but I have now produced a suitable script
Great!
> I've attached the update as a tarball containing the two new files,
> `pdfroff.sh' and `pdfroff.man', together with a patch against the
> CVS versions on which my additional modifications are based
Only the attachment with
Keith Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Werner, fellow groffers,
>
> It's taken a while, but I have now produced a suitable script -- I've called
> it `pdfroff', since it's syntax closely follows groff's own, and it generates
> PDF output, regardless of whether `pdfmark.tmac' is used, o
On Friday 17 December 2004 5:04 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Given that I do have quite heavy constraints on my time, at the
> > moment, how would you like me to prioritise my efforts?
>
> Integration into the groff build system. This is, `./configure; make;
> make install' at top-level should in
