|Ralph Corderoy wrote:
||> (For the list: mawk(1) requires a fflush("") in order to "getline <
||> NAME" a file NAME that has been written via "print >> NAME" before,
||> even though fflush("") is not standard and i cannot imagine a
||> situation where an awk(1) script would not like to see a
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
|> (For the list: mawk(1) requires a fflush("") in order to "getline <
|> NAME" a file NAME that has been written via "print >> NAME" before,
|> even though fflush("") is not standard and i cannot imagine a
|> situation where an awk(1) script would not like to see a fflus
Hallo Ingo, list,
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:21:36PM +0100:
|> Ok, but i really wonder now -- why? If it is normal that .Va and
|> other requests extend until the next macro switches the current
|> mode (the mdoc macros seem to transport significa
Hi Steffen,
> (For the list: mawk(1) requires a fflush("") in order to "getline <
> NAME" a file NAME that has been written via "print >> NAME" before,
> even though fflush("") is not standard and i cannot imagine a
> situation where an awk(1) script would not like to see a fflush("") on
> NAME be
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:21:36PM +0100:
> Ok, but i really wonder now -- why? If it is normal that .Va and
> other requests extend until the next macro switches the current
> mode (the mdoc macros seem to transport significant amount of
> state from a shallow
Hey, Ingo, Werner, list,
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
|Werner LEMBERG wrote on Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0100:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|>> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
|>> attached):
|>>
|>> source:
|>> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
|>> groff a
Hallo Werner,
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
|> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
|> attached):
|>
|> source:
|> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
|> groff and mandoc agree.
|> .It Fn at_quick_exit , _atexit
|> Only mandoc gets that right.
|>
|> mandoc:
|>
Hi Werner and Steffen,
Werner LEMBERG wrote on Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 02:19:38PM +0100:
> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
>> attached):
>>
>> source:
>> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
>> groff and mandoc agree.
>> .It Fn at_quick_e
Hello,
i finally come around to implement my proposed mdoc(7) reference
extension and yesterday i stumbled over a interpretation
difference (full source attached):
source:
.It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
groff and mandoc agree.
.It Fn at_quick_exit , _atexit
Only mandoc gets that right.
> [...] i stumbled over a interpretation difference (full source
> attached):
>
> source:
> .It Fn at_quick_exit , Fn _atexit
> groff and mandoc agree.
> .It Fn at_quick_exit , _atexit
> Only mandoc gets that right.
>
> mandoc:
> at_quick_exit(), _atexit()
> grof
10 matches
Mail list logo
