Re: [Groff] gropdf driver (was: pdfroff produces two copies)

2009-08-06 Thread joerg van den hoff
thank you, and just a short confirmation that, indeed, now it works seemingly perfect for me. all the best joerg On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:11:50 +0200, Deri James wrote: On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:30:50 joerg van den hoff wrote: Warning: An error occurred while reading an XR

Re: [Groff] gropdf driver (was: pdfroff produces two copies)

2009-08-06 Thread Deri James
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:30:50 joerg van den hoff wrote: > Warning: An error occurred while reading an XREF table. > The file has been damaged. This may have been caused > by a problem while converting or transfering the file. > Ghostscript will attempt t

Re: [Groff] gropdf driver (was: pdfroff produces two copies)

2009-08-05 Thread Deri James
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 11:30:50 joerg van den hoff wrote: > just a short feedback: > > 1.) > thanks! > > 2.) > in a first test with > > groff 1.19.3 > perl v5.8.8 > macosX > > this seems to work more or less correctly. > but with a small text sample the generated pdf was about a factor of > 10

Re: [Groff] gropdf driver (was: pdfroff produces two copies)

2009-08-05 Thread joerg van den hoff
just a short feedback: 1.) thanks! 2.) in a first test with groff 1.19.3 perl v5.8.8 macosX this seems to work more or less correctly. but with a small text sample the generated pdf was about a factor of 10 larger than that resulting from `ps2pdf' (i.e. gs). furthermore `gv' complained when

[Groff] gropdf driver (was: pdfroff produces two copies)

2009-08-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[Deri, I hope it's OK with you that I cite from your private email to me.] > My main motivation for using pdfroff instead of plain groff -Tps is > that ghostscript (and all the document viewers based on it) produces > (IMO) ugly font output when viewing PostScript files in X, whereas > poppler p