On Saturday 22 Jan 2011 09:54:45 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>"The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
> >>
> >> ‘.end’."
> >>
> >> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the
> >> meaning is obvious.
> >
> > It was the same thing for me, I couldn
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>"The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
> >> ‘.end’."
> >>
> Any improvement in the wording is highly welcomed.
It's quite not easy for me, but let's try this:
"If a second argument is given to de (for exemple .de name end),
>> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to
>> ‘.end’."
>>
>> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the
>> meaning is obvious.
>
> It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly understand this
> until I saw examples in om.tmac.
Any improveme
Ralph Graulich wrote:
> "The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to ‘.end’."
>
> For me this sentence is difficult to understand, although the meaning is
> obvious.
It was the same thing for me, I couldn't exactly
understand this until I saw examples in om.tmac.
But I'
Hello troffers!
English is not my native language, so please take this into account.
In the current edition of groff.texinfo (Edition 1.21, Winter 2010) it reads
unter section '5.21 Writing Macros':
"The optional second argument to de changes this to a macro to ‘.end’."
For me this sen
