Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> If you are working for a distro, it is a good idea to tag the manual > pages. For example, >.\" -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- > for German or French manpages that are not already in UTF-8 format, I'll soon add French support to groff which uses iso-8859-15 encoding (to have character `œ' which

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-23 Thread Bruno Haible
> not every manual page is tagged properly (e.g., the passwd(5) manual > page is not tagged) If you are working for a distro, it is a good idea to tag the manual pages. For example, .\" -*- coding: iso-8859-1 -*- for German or French manpages that are not already in UTF-8 format, .\" -*- c

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-20 Thread Jim Gifford
Werner, On of my guys did some testing of the current cvs and ran into same issues. Here they are The relocation stuff segfaults, so I had to disable it by editing src/libs/libgroff/Makefile.sub. New Groff is still not able to format Japanese manuals. The "-k" and encoding autog

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> On of my guys did some testing of the current cvs and ran into > same issues. Here they are [...] I got this mail, and I'll reply soon. Werner ___ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> What is the list of supported scripts/languages? This depends on the output device. Honestly, I don't know :-) Ideally, there should be a script which takes a groff font description file, converts the glyph names to Unicode, and checks the result against character sets and languages. Note th

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-19 Thread Michail Vidiassov
Dear Werner, On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote: Is the current CVS of groff, utf-8 friendly. Yes. Note that you still need fonts which actually have those Unicode characters. What is the list of supported scripts/languages? What about including with groff some base set of large fonts

Re: [Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Is the current CVS of groff, utf-8 friendly. Yes. It doesn't have the final form (the preconv preprocessor will get folded into soelim) which means that files included with .so aren't handled yet automatically, but the interface won't change, this is, options `-k' and `-K ' will stay to convert

[Groff] UTF-8 Readiness

2006-01-18 Thread Jim Gifford
Is the current CVS of groff, utf-8 friendly. I'm working on a project to create base utf-8 support for a distro. I know the main concern from my research is the fact that groff at the time didn't like the utf-8 encoding, but looking at the list these issues may of been addressed, I just wanted