Re: [Groff] Re: once more hdtbl

2010-02-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> 2) I would remove line 87 in Makefile.sub to prevent common.roff >>> from beeing deleted by make clean. >> >> I'm not too good with anything beyond basic Makefiles. Werner, can >> you verify that this is the right fix? > > Will check soon. Fixed too. Thanks! Werner

[Groff] Re: once more hdtbl

2010-02-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> 1) In fonts_x.in und fonts_n.in: >> .so examples/common.roff >> is missing. > > Fixed in attached patch, please test. Applied, thanks. >> 2) I would remove line 87 in Makefile.sub to prevent common.roff >> from beeing deleted by make clean. > > I'm not too good with anything beyond basic Ma

[Groff] Re: once more hdtbl

2010-02-04 Thread Larry Kollar
Joachim Walsdorff wrote: thanks for spending your time to improve hdtbl. It's a good idea to seperate hdtbl- and example stuff into hdmisc.tmac respectively common.roff. But some little things now seem to be wrong. 1) In fonts_x.in und fonts_n.in: .so examples/common.roff is missing. Fix

[Groff] Re: once more hdtbl

2010-02-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> thanks for spending your time to improve hdtbl. It's a good idea to > separate hdtbl- and example stuff into hdmisc.tmac respectively > common.roff. But some little things now seem to be wrong. [...] I leave this to Larry :-) > And in groff_hdtbl.man should be described only hdtbl specific >