Keith Marshall wrote:
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 5:25 pm, Louis Guillaume wrote:
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
sorry to interfere, but \*[SN-DOT], \*[SN-NO-DOT] seem not be there
in groff 1.19.1 (which is what I'm running on my Mac), at least they
don't work and are not present in s.tmac. did they oc
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 5:25 pm, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> > sorry to interfere, but \*[SN-DOT], \*[SN-NO-DOT] seem not be there
> > in groff 1.19.1 (which is what I'm running on my Mac), at least they
> > don't work and are not present in s.tmac. did they occur only _af
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> sorry to interfere, but \*[SN-DOT], \*[SN-NO-DOT] seem not be there in
> groff 1.19.1 (which is what I'm running on my Mac), at least they don't
> work and are not present in s.tmac. did they occur only _after_ 1.19.1
> or what am I missing?
>>
Keith verified off-list
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
[Re: availability of SN-DOT, SN-NO-DOT and other s.tmac features]
>> PORPHANS/HORPHANS
>>give the user finer control of the number of initial lines of
>>a paragraph which must be kept together, on the same page, for
>>free standing paragraphs and after a headi
Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
> sorry to interfere, but \*[SN-DOT], \*[SN-NO-DOT] seem not be there
> in groff 1.19.1 (which is what I'm running on my Mac), at least they
> don't work and are not present in s.tmac. did they occur only _after_
> 1.19.1 or what am I missing?
See my later follow-up. The
Keith Marshall wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 5:47 pm, Louis Guillaume wrote:
Thank you for the explanation. This is great. "\*[SN]" works.
Note that \*[SN_DOT] does not appear to work!
Sorry, my mistake. That should have been \*[SN-DOT], and \*[SN-NO-DOT]
for the case without the terminal d
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 8:55 pm, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Note that \*[SN_DOT] does not appear to work!
>
> A typo; it's called \*[SN-DOT]
More like failing memory :-) Should have checked the manpage *before* I
posted! Of course, the effect is the same: sorry, I got it wrong :-(
Regards,
Keit
> Note that \*[SN_DOT] does not appear to work!
A typo; it's called \*[SN-DOT]
> Is there a document that covers these escapes? I can't find anything in
> groff(7) or in info groff.
Try groff_ms(7).
Werner
___
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 5:47 pm, Louis Guillaume wrote:
> Thank you for the explanation. This is great. "\*[SN]" works.
>
> Note that \*[SN_DOT] does not appear to work!
Sorry, my mistake. That should have been \*[SN-DOT], and \*[SN-NO-DOT]
for the case without the terminal dot; (IIRC, these two
Keith MARSHALL wrote:
> Louis Gillaume wrote:
>> I'm looking for a way to get my section numbers in the table of
>> contents. This is with -ms.
>>
>> This is what I've been trying:
>>
>> .NH 1
>> OVERVIEW
>> .XS
>> \n[H1]
>> \.\n[H2]
>
> You would need \&.\n[H1] here, if the intention is to pass t
Louis Gillaume wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to get my section numbers in the table of
> contents. This is with -ms.
>
> This is what I've been trying:
>
> .NH 1
> OVERVIEW
> .XS
> \n[H1]
> \.\n[H2]
You would need \&.\n[H1] here, if the intention is to pass the initial
dot through as text; (the \
Louis Guillaume wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to get my section numbers in the table of
contents. This is with -ms.
This is what I've been trying:
.NH 1
OVERVIEW
.XS
\n[H1]
\.\n[H2]
\.\n[H3]
OVERVIEW
.XE
The above produces...
1 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to get my section numbers in the table of
contents. This is with -ms.
This is what I've been trying:
.NH 1
OVERVIEW
.XS
\n[H1]
\.\n[H2]
\.\n[H3]
OVERVIEW
.XE
The above produces...
1 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
... in the table
13 matches
Mail list logo
