Vaibhaw Pandey wrote:
|Steffen,
|
|I took a shot at reviewing this last week. Turned out I don't have enough
|context of the groff code base to be able to do a useful review. I am
|currently familiarizing myself with the parts of code to which this review
|is pertinent. However, given my cur
Steffen,
I took a shot at reviewing this last week. Turned out I don't have enough
context of the groff code base to be able to do a useful review. I am
currently familiarizing myself with the parts of code to which this review
is pertinent. However, given my current abilities and the size of the
Hallo Werner,
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
|I don't have time to review this. I suggest that you open an
|bugtracker issue and post a cleaned-up mbox file for further
|inspection.
You don't need to review but could just commit it, it is ok by
itself. I.e., i would commit it.
|It's really time th
So for some more annoyance i'll also post the review tweaks.
Brings some consistency and avoids a uselessly large buffer.
Everything in the Public Domain, of course.
Ciao,
--steffen
commit b3f543a09f987abacbd13b590cb6b5d1a342c650
Author: Steffen Nurpmeso
Date: 2014-07-28 17:46:27 +0200
fil
First: someone messed up the subject when reencoding the message,
the correct one would have been
Input file_case encapsulation --with-unpack (and --with-zlib) support
Sorry. (Don't use Python.)
I wrote:
[.]
| ea111b9 Add GROFF_UNPACK_CHECK m4++ / --with-unpack=XY (Public Domain)
|
|New
