Re: [Groff] Giving .UE and .ME an argument

2007-02-05 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please do so. Some time tonight. Must go get dinner now. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond

Re: [Groff] Giving .UE and .ME an argument

2007-02-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> 2) Add the argument handing, and abolish the (now redundant) second >arguments of .UR and .MT. OK. > Therefore, fair warning: if I don't see an objection within a > reasonable time, I'm going to implement and document the second > change. Please do so. Werner

Re: [Groff] Giving .UE and .ME an argument

2007-02-05 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> There was no response from the list. I don't want this change > to hang forever waiting for one if nobody cares about the > issue. I prefer the version with the punctuation on the ending macro only.

[Groff] Giving .UE and .ME an argument

2007-02-05 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Last week Werner, following up on my proposal to allow .UE and .ME to take arguments that are treated as trailing punctuation, asked for opinions on the relative merits of two changes: 1) Just add the argument handling to .UE and .ME. 2) Add the argument handing, and abolish the (now redundant) s