> > Of all output formats groff is supporting, only PS has support for
> > font-based underlining.
>
> I am not sure what this implies. If PostScript provides a
> font-specific underline, it should be made available in groff devps
> fonts, and some simple requests to access those values a
Dear list,
Thank you for your swift reply, Mr. Lemberg.
However, I am not entirely satisfied.
Of all output formats groff is supporting, only PS has support
for font-based underlining.
I am not sure what this implies. If PostScript
provides a font-specific underline, it
> 1) The UnderlinePosition and UnderlineThickness values from the
> afm files are discarded by afmtodit. There is nothing
> corresponding to the in the groff devps font files. How is
> groff then expected to provide proper underlining to text?
Of all output formats groff is supporti
Dear list,
I have been groff-ing for some time now, and have been
primarily interested in the mom macro package. However, I have
some questions to ask about groff font structure for PostScript
output.
1) The UnderlinePosition and UnderlineThickness values from the
afm files are discar
