Re: [Groff] [PATCH] correct some \c-related markup

2017-05-02 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
"G. Branden Robinson" wrote: |At 2017-05-01T19:30:02+0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> "G. Branden Robinson" wrote: |>|Please find a patch attached. ... |> I for one always found those one/two/one/two/.. macros very |> suspicious, but now i see actual use cases. | |One of the advantages o

Re: [Groff] [PATCH] correct some \c-related markup

2017-05-01 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2017-05-01T19:30:02+0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > "G. Branden Robinson" wrote: > |Please find a patch attached. > > Ordinary an ordinary, is that true. That was a tagged paragraph without a tag, so I gave it one. Without a tag, I don't understand the point of calculating an indent (\w'pun

Re: [Groff] [PATCH] correct some \c-related markup

2017-05-01 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
"G. Branden Robinson" wrote: |Please find a patch attached. Ordinary an ordinary, is that true. I for one always found those one/two/one/two/.. macros very suspicious, but now i see actual use cases. --steffen |Soylent Green is people!

[Groff] [PATCH] correct some \c-related markup

2017-05-01 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Please find a patch attached. I took some before-and-after screenshots depicting the impact of each "hunk" of the diff. (An earlier attempt to submit this patch with this illustrative support was thwarted by the attachment size limit.) You can find the screenshots here: https://www.dropbox.com/