Re: groff 1.23.0.rc2 readiness

2022-05-26 Thread Humm
Why did v9 or v10, whichever it was, switch from using minus signs to using hyphens for options? -- Humm

Re: .TQ to replace .PD 0

2022-05-24 Thread Humm
have no idea how to measure the frequency of the latter, but i guess it is very rare. Regarding commercial UNIX systems, i do not have access to any of them except Solaris. Always forgetting us poor Plan 9 users … -- Humm

Re: an angry rant about *BSD Make

2022-03-29 Thread Humm
cerned, the suffixes just aren’t allowed to contain periods themselves. -- Humm

Re: AT&T troff requests

2022-03-28 Thread Humm
can't find much to say. I understand. I wonder where such documentation might be appropriate today—I wish for future me to have an easier time finding information. -- Humm

AT&T troff requests

2022-03-27 Thread Humm
. The meaning of the arguments is now: 01 trace numeric arguments (default on) 02 trace requests 04 trace macros […] `.gd xx` sets number registers dn and dl to the size of diversion xx. -- Humm

Re: [BUG] groff: inconsistent behavior of " to separate arguments

2022-03-25 Thread Humm
of any release prior to the fourth edition, though it appears there should be no legal impediment to their distribution[1]. They can be downloaded from https://p9f.org/dl/index.html . -- Humm

Re: Fwd: [BUG] groff: inconsistent behavior of " to separate arguments

2022-03-25 Thread Humm
lying, I would have found you having found links already. -- Humm

Re: [BUG] groff: inconsistent behavior of " to separate arguments

2022-03-25 Thread Humm
lan 9 in the devutf device. The files are dated 1993-01-04. -- Humm

Re: [BUG] Hyperlink macros: breaking should conserve the full hyperlink

2022-02-07 Thread Humm
Content-Type: application/x-troff-man Fun fact: There is text/troff. See RFC 4263. This could be something like `text/troff; process=-man`. -- Humm

Re: style: .MR

2022-02-07 Thread Humm
Personally, I’d much rather see a KWIC permuted index of the NAME sections. (At least some of mentioned Programmer’s Manuals have that too.) -- Humm

Re: style: .MR

2022-02-07 Thread Humm
all with -man. (That doesn’t seem like a better imagination though.) -- Humm

Re: style: .MR

2022-02-07 Thread Humm
ut on the standard output stream .IR stdout . -- Humm

Re: style: .MR

2022-02-07 Thread Humm
to refer to the man page itself, you can use wording like q.v. If you want to refer to the thing described, you can fight for a consensus by using the one and only correct .I. (Or .MR could be changed with only one or an empty second argument to not emit parentheses.) -- Humm

Re: Plan 9 man added a new macro for man page references

2022-01-03 Thread Humm
going to change anymore and to a number of people, me included, “Plan 9 troff” sounds like someone meant “9front troff”. That’s confusing. -- Humm

Re: MR macro for man page cross references added to man(7)

2022-01-02 Thread Humm
, but still inconsistent with p9p -man. There, you’d do .MR ls (1) . -- Humm