By the way,
On Sun Feb 23, 2025 at 12:53 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2025-02-22T23:23:35+0100, onf wrote:
> > If that's an accurate characterization, then please explain what that
> > NEWS file is about, because I don't get it.
>
> Again your references are too broad and too general.
Hi Dave,
On Sun Feb 23, 2025 at 12:59 AM CET, Dave Kemper wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 4:24 PM onf wrote:
> > The combination of points 1, 5, and 5b seems to imply that
> > .nx nx \" load file nx
> >
> > will be interpretted as loading file 'nx ' (without the quotes).
>
> Correct. I opened
Dear Branden,
On Sun Feb 23, 2025 at 12:53 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [...]
> > It doesn't, because there is not a single line containing a comment
> > separated from the argument by a space. Read the examples I gave
> > above.
>
> I understand now. You are bewailing the removal of supp
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 4:24 PM onf wrote:
> The combination of points 1, 5, and 5b seems to imply that
> .nx nx \" load file nx
>
> will be interpretted as loading file 'nx ' (without the quotes).
Correct. I opened http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66673 in response to
this observation about the
[giving this sub-thread a more appropriate title]
At 2025-02-22T23:23:35+0100, onf wrote:
> [re-arranging]
>
> On Sat Feb 22, 2025 at 9:37 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At 2025-02-22T16:38:00+0100, onf wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I feel like changing ab, hpf, hpfa, nx, so, and tm (the others
Hi Branden,
[re-arranging]
On Sat Feb 22, 2025 at 9:37 PM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2025-02-22T16:38:00+0100, onf wrote:
> [...]
> > I feel like changing ab, hpf, hpfa, nx, so, and tm (the others aren't
> > implemented by neatroff) to allow spaces in the middle of their
> > arguments m
At 2025-02-22T16:38:00+0100, onf wrote:
> I forgot to emphasize the likely largest obstacle, which is the fact
> that it
(presumably Savannah #66625, and/or changes already in Git)
> would break compatibility with documents written for neatroff.
In what way?
> Ali seems averse to breaking backw
[self-reply; Benno not CCed]
At 2025-02-22T02:40:32-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Benno,
>
> I have some partial good news.
[...]
> I'm attaching HTML renderings with groff 1.23.0 and the bleeding edge.
For once I _didn't_ forget the attachments; I checked my Sent folder and
they're pres
On Sat Feb 22, 2025 at 4:46 AM CET, onf wrote:
> On Sat Feb 22, 2025 at 2:06 AM CET, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > if I follow through on Savannah #66625,
> > I mean to preserve traditional AT&T troff behavior of `tm` and `ab` in
> > compatibility mode, mainly because I can imagine people using `t
Il 21 febbraio 2025 alle 16:41 G. Branden Robinson ha scritto:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> At 2025-02-21T16:19:25+0100, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> > can I format/scale numbers when interpolating them?
>
> Not without arithmetic, as far as I know.
Thanks, my mind is at peace now that I know for sure!
Hi Benno,
I have some partial good news.
At 2025-02-17T11:52:27+0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> Op 16-02-2025 om 15:13 schreef G. Branden Robinson:
> > > Is there a way to mark such long options in the man page so that
> > > browsers are prevented from breaking the marked text in any way?
> >
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
