[self-follow-up]
At 2024-10-16T19:49:43-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> When the DEC Alpha, Cray, and PA-RISC came along, a lot of C
> programmers who'd been supremely confident of the, shall we say,
> well-established behavior of their code were quickly disabused of some
> deluded notions.
Th
Hi Dave,
At 2024-10-16T19:51:38-0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> During Werner's tenure, I looked into
> (http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2018-11/msg00014.html) getting the list
> software to automatically reply to any non-savannah emails, directing
> the sender to the bug tracker or the discussion list in
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 7:01 PM joerg van den hoff wrote:
> I wrote to groff-bug, I wanted (and want) to keep the response on that list.
> that's my decision, not
> yours.
Just so you know, bug-groff (like groff-commit) is not intended to be
a discussion list; it exists to lets users see all ema
Hi Dave,
At 2024-10-16T18:39:01-0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 4:13 PM G. Branden Robinson
> wrote:
> > On many machine architectures, in the C language, a pointer occupies
> > the same number of bits as an `int` variable. Clearly we can assume
> > that they're always equival
On 17.10.24 01:39, Dave Kemper wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:01 PM joerg van den hoff wrote:
I now double-checked: the manual seems to indicate that w/o preceding mk, rt
needs an argument
(distance from page top). if it _really_ does the line would have to read `.rt
0'. but doing this
d
On 16.10.24 23:12, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[replying only to the lists, since you're not honoring the Reply-To
header anyway]
I wrote to groff-bug, I wanted (and want) to keep the response on that list. that's my decision, not
yours.
Hi Joerg,
At 2024-10-16T22:01:02+0200, joerg van
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:01 PM joerg van den hoff wrote:
> I now double-checked: the manual seems to indicate that w/o preceding mk, rt
> needs an argument
> (distance from page top). if it _really_ does the line would have to read
> `.rt 0'. but doing this
> does not change behaviour neither f
[replying only to the lists, since you're not honoring the Reply-To
header anyway]
Hi Joerg,
At 2024-10-16T22:01:02+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> > At 2024-10-16T13:30:23+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> > > I ran into this problem several months ago but did never suspect
> > > it would be r
On 16.10.24 19:38, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
[CCing groff@gnu and directing Reply-To there]
Hi Joerg,
hi branden,
At 2024-10-16T13:30:23+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
I ran into this problem several months ago but did never suspect it
would be related to a preceding update to 1.23 (w
[CCing groff@gnu and directing Reply-To there]
Hi Joerg,
At 2024-10-16T13:30:23+0200, joerg van den hoff wrote:
> I ran into this problem several months ago but did never suspect it
> would be related to a preceding update to 1.23 (which happened as part
> of general package update run so I did n
10 matches
Mail list logo
